Categories
Archives
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
Sign up to our Newsletter
Highlights from Digital Breakfast ‘Online Accessibility - making the web accessible to all’
Thanks to all those who came to the APA Digital Breakfast this week, which was about ‘Online Accessibility'.
It was a great session that gave everyone both a practical, and thought provoking look at accessibility of the web to those with disabilities - an important topic that anyone involved in online work should have an understanding of.
Highlights from the digital breakfast >> Read more »
APA Training Workshop 'Online Writing' on Tue 06 Oct - book now
We are now taking bookings for our 2nd in a series of half day workshops for APA members. Taking place on Tue 06 Oct hosted at the IAB, in their training centre in Holborn, London.
The workshop topic focusing on 'Online Writing - planning online content and editorial stategies for brands'.
More details on the workshop and how to book >> Read more »
Luxury Publishing in administration
Luxury Publishing, customer publisher for upmarket clients such as personal concierge outfit Quintessentially, has gone into administration, potentially placing about 13 jobs at risk.
Forward retains Transport for London’s e-zine business in competitive pitch
Forward is delighted to retain Transport for London's (TfL) London Loop e-zine business following a statutory competitive pitch. Forward first published Transport for London's London Loop e-zine in 2006 and has worked with them since 2005.
Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) decides editorial is advertising
On the 19th August the ASA decided that editorial, which appeared on the same page of the Daily Express as an advertisement for products featured in the editorial, should have been identified as an Advertising Feature and was subject to the Committee of Advertising Practice (CAP) Code.
A complaint was made by a competitor of the advertiser that, contrary to the CAP Code, claims about the product advertised and featured in the adjacent article were not true and could not be substantiated.
Read about the decision in full >> Read more »
« Previous Next »